Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC, 03-1972 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 03-1972
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 23, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Defendant, Appellee.On page 8, after the colon on line 2, the portion of the, sentence reading usually the availability of a mixed-motive, analysis depends should be revised to read the rule that, usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depended
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 03-1972 ROY HILLSTROM, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BEST WESTERN TLC HOTEL, Defendant, Appellee. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on December 31, 2003 is amended as follows: On page 2, line 3, "April 2002" should be replaced with "April 2000" On page 8, after the colon on line 2, the portion of the sentence reading "usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depends" should be revised to read "the rule that usually the availability of a mixed-motive analysis depended"
Source: CourtListener
